# What Is Per Unit Subsidy? (Question)

• A per-unit subsidy, on the other hand, is an amount of money that the government pays to either producers or consumers for each unit of goods that is bought and sold. Mathematically speaking, a subsidy functions like a negative tax.

## What does subsidy pay mean?

A subsidy is a direct or indirect payment to individuals or firms, usually in the form of a cash payment from the government or a targeted tax cut. In economic theory, subsidies can be used to offset market failures and externalities to achieve greater economic efficiency.

## What is subsidy with example?

Definition: Subsidy is a transfer of money from the government to an entity. It leads to a fall in the price of the subsidised product. It is a part of non-plan expenditure of the government. Major subsidies in India are petroleum subsidy, fertiliser subsidy, food subsidy, interest subsidy, etc.

## What is the price sellers receive before and after the subsidy?

Before the subsidy, the price is P1. After the subsidy, the price received by sellers is PS and the effective price paid by consumers is PD, which equals PS minus 50 cents. Before the subsidy, the quantity of cones sold is Q1; after the subsidy the quantity increases to Q2.

## Why do governments give subsidies?

When market imperfections exist, it is the right of governments to use subsidies to palliate those that are ill-advantaged. For example, in a low-monetized economy, subsidies can achieve more efficient social policy – it may be easier to slash food staple prices to consumers than to make social transfers.

## Are subsidies good or bad?

Since subsidies result in lower revenues for producers of foreign countries, they are a source of tension between the United States, Europe and poorer developing countries. While subsidies may provide immediate benefits to an industry, in the long-run they may prove to have unethical, negative effects.

## Are wage subsidies income?

Premiums are normally established for an employer based on their workers’ earnings, regardless of the source of those earnings. The subsidy is not considered assessable earnings when an employer receives the subsidy and uses the amount to supplement wages for an employee who is not working or is furloughed.

## Is a subsidy a loan?

Subsidized Loans are loans for undergraduate students with financial need, as determined by your cost of attendance minus expected family contribution and other financial aid (such as grants or scholarships). Subsidized Loans do not accrue interest while you are in school at least half-time or during deferment periods.

While many industries receive government subsidies, three of the biggest beneficiaries are energy, agriculture, and transportation.

## What are the types of subsidy?

Subsidies take many different forms but can be divided into five broad categories.

• Export subsidies. An export subsidy is when the government provides financial support to companies for the purpose of exporting goods to sell internationally.
• Agriculture subsidies.
• Oil subsidies.
• Housing subsidies.
• Healthcare subsidies.

## Does a subsidy increase supply or demand?

When government subsidies are implemented to the supplier, an industry is able to allow its producers to produce more goods and services. This increases the overall supply of that good or service, which increases the quantity demanded of that good or service and lowers the overall price of the good or service.

## Is a subsidy a tax?

Subsidy. While a tax drives a wedge that increases the price consumers have to pay and decreases the price producers receive, a subsidy does the opposite. A subsidy is a benefit given by the government to groups or individuals, usually in the form of a cash payment or a tax reduction.

## Does a subsidy increase total surplus?

A subsidy generally affects a market by reducing the price paid by buyers and increasing the quantity sold. The buyers, who now pay a lower price, gain area B in consumer surplus. However, the total cost of the subsidy to the government is Z*Qn, which is equal to areas A+B+C.

## Subsidies

A subsidy is a sum of money granted directly to businesses by the government in order to stimulate the production and consumption of goods and services. A unit subsidy is a specified payment that is paid to the producer for each unit of product produced. In the case of a particular per unit subsidy, the result is to push the supply curve vertically downwards by the amount of the subsidy received. As a result, the new supply curve will be parallel to the previous supply curve in this situation.

### The incidence of a subsidy

To promote production and consumption, the government provides a lump sum of money directly to businesses as a form of subsidy. In the case of unit subsidies, the producer receives a specified sum per unit of product sold. A particular per unit subsidy has the effect of shifting the supply curve vertically downwards by the amount of the subsidy. As a result, the new supply curve will be parallel to the previous supply curve in this situation. If demand elasticity is high, the result will be a decrease in price and an increase in output.

## Understanding Subsidy Benefit, Cost, and Effect on the Market

In most cases, we are all familiar with the concept of “per-unit tax,” which is a quantity of money that the government takes from either producers or consumers for each unit of commodities that is purchased and sold. The term “per-unit subsidy” refers to the amount of money that the government provides to either producers or consumers for every unit of products that is purchased and sold. From a mathematical standpoint, subsidies operate similarly to a negative tax. Whenever a subsidy is in place, the entire amount of money that is received by the producer for the sale of products is equal to the total amount of money that is paid by consumers plus the amount of the subsidy.

The following is an example of how a subsidy influences market equilibrium:

## Market Equilibrium Definition and Equations

Jodi Beggs is a singer and songwriter. To begin, what exactly is market equilibrium? It is said that market equilibrium has occurred when the amount of goods provided in a market (represented by Qs in this equation) equals the quantity demanded in a market (QD in the equation). In order to find the market equilibrium produced by a subsidy on a graph, these equations must be used in conjunction with another equation or two.

## Market Equilibrium With a Subsidy

Jodi Beggs is a singer and songwriter. When a subsidy is implemented, a handful of considerations must be kept in mind in order to determine market equilibrium. In the first place, the demand curve is a function of the price that a consumer pays out of pocket for an item (Pc), since the price that consumers pay out of pocket for a good impacts their consumption decisions. Second, the supply curve is a function of the price that a producer receives for a good (Pp), since the amount received by a producer impacts the incentives that the producer has to create the commodity.

More exactly, the quantity at which the corresponding price to the producer (as determined by the supply curve) equals the price that the consumer pays (as determined by the demand curve) plus the amount of the subsidy is the equilibrium quantity with the subsidy.

The supply and demand curves are shaped in such a way that this amount will be bigger than the equilibrium quantity that would have prevailed if the subsidy had not been provided. Consequently, we might infer that subsidies enhance the number of goods purchased and sold in a market.

## Welfare Impact of a Subsidy

Jodi Beggs is a singer and songwriter. The economic impact of a subsidy should not only be considered in terms of its influence on market prices and quantities, but it should also be considered in terms of its direct impact on the welfare of consumers and producers in the market. Consider the regions labeled A-H on the figure above as a starting point. Regions A and B combined reflect consumer surplus in a free market, since they represent the additional advantages that consumers in a market obtain from an item that are in addition to and above the price that they pay for it.

The whole surplus, or the overall economic value generated by this market (also known as the social surplus) is equal to the sum of the following four factors: A, B, C, and D.

## Consumer Impact of a Subsidy

Jodi Beggs is a singer and songwriter. When a subsidy is implemented, the calculations of consumer and producer surpluses get a little more difficult, but the basic rules remain the same. Consumers receive the area over and below the price that they pay (Pc) and above and below their value (which is determined by the demand curve) for all of the units that they purchase in the market. This area is represented by the letters A + B + C + F + G on the figure. As a result of the subsidies, customers are better off as a result of it.

## Producer Impact of a Subsidy

Similarly, producers receive the space between the price that they receive (Pp) and the price that they charge above their cost (which is determined by the supply curve) for all of the units that they sell in the market. On the figure, this area is represented by the letters B, C, D, and E. Because of this, producers gain from the subsidy. In general, consumers and producers share the advantages of a subsidy regardless of whether the subsidy is directed directly to producers or consumers. A subsidy given directly to consumers is unlikely to benefit everyone, and a subsidy given directly to producers is unlikely to benefit everyone.

## Cost of a Subsidy

Jodi Beggs is a singer and songwriter. Whenever a subsidy is implemented, it is critical to evaluate not just the impact of the subsidy on consumers and producers, but also the amount of money that the subsidy will cost the government and eventually the taxpayers. As shown by this equation, if the government offers a S subsidy on each unit purchased and sold, the total cost of the subsidy is equal to S times the equilibrium amount present in the market at the time the subsidy is implemented.

## Graph of Cost of a Subsidy

Jodi Beggs is a singer and songwriter. To illustrate the entire cost of the subsidy graphically, a rectangle may be drawn with a height of S and a width equal to the equilibrium quantity of goods purchased and sold while benefiting from the subsidy (see Figure 1). A rectangle of this type is seen in this picture, and it may also be represented by the letters B + C + E + F + G + H. It makes sense to conceive of money that is paid out by an organization as negative revenue since revenue reflects money that is brought into the company.

As a consequence, the “government revenue” component of the overall surplus is provided by -(B + C + E + F + G + H) where B is the number of government revenues. When all of the surplus components are added together, the overall surplus under the subsidy is equal to A + B + C + D – H.

## Deadweight Loss of a Subsidy

Jodi Beggs is a singer and songwriter. It is concluded that subsidies result in economic inefficiency, also known as deadweight loss, because the overall surplus in a market under a subsidy is smaller than the total surplus in a free market. This graphic depicts the deadweight loss as area H, which is the shaded triangle to the right of the free market quantity (as shown in the diagram). When a government provides a subsidy, it promotes economic inefficiency because it costs the government more money to implement the subsidy than the subsidy generates in additional benefits for consumers and producers.

## Are Subsidies Bad for Society?

However, despite the seeming inefficiency of subsidies, it is not always the case that subsidies constitute inefficient public policy. When positive externalities are present in a market, subsidies, on the other hand, might increase rather than decrease the total surplus. Furthermore, when considering fairness or equality problems, as well as markets for needs like as food or clothes, where cost rather than product appeal is the primary constraint on desire to pay, subsidies might make sense.

## HOME Maximum Per-Unit Subsidy Limits

In light of the cessation of the Section 221(d)(3) mortgage insurance program, other maximum per-unit subsidy limitations for the HOME Program must be applied for the time being. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is obligated to file a regulation to set new maximum per-unit subsidy limitations for the HOME Program since it is no longer revising and publishing restrictions for the Section 221(d)(3) mortgage insurance program. While a new rule is being developed, HUD published a Notice establishing an interim policy that Field Office staff and participating jurisdictions (PJs) must follow.

• This interim policy continues in force until the effective date of the new final rule provisions, which change the existing requirements of 24 CFR 92.250, which are set to take effect on January 1, 2019.
• A blanket mortgage insured under Section 234 is a mortgage that is used for the construction or major rehabilitation of multifamily complexes that will be sold as individual condominium units when they are completed.
• The substitution of the Section 234 basic mortgage restrictions for the Section 221(d)(3) limits is consistent with the objective of the NAHA as well as the implementing requirements of the HOME Final Rule, as shown in the chart below.
• The Office of Multifamily Housing additionally develops high cost percentage exceptions (HCP) for specified locations, which are administered by the Housing Finance Agency.
• 100 percent of the basic mortgage limit plus up to 140 percent in high cost areas).
• It is the responsibility of participating jurisdictions to make contact with the CPD Division at their local HUD Field Offices in order to learn the maximum HOME per-unit subsidy restrictions that apply to them.
• PJs should use the High Cost Percentages and Section 234 basic mortgage limits that are published in the Federal Register by HUD’s Office of Multifamily Housing.

Specifically, the minimum HOME investment in rental housing or homeownership is \$1,000 multiplied by the number of HOME-assisted units, as defined in the HOME rules at 24 CFR 92.205. The maximum HOME investment is \$1,000,000. (c).

### Limits

Beginning on September 9, 2021, the annual indexing of basic statutory mortgage limits for multifamily housing programs (Section 234) will be implemented. High Cost Percentage Exceptions (HCP) for the Base City (PDF) – Effective September 9, 2021

#### 2020

Section 234 (PDF) – Annual Indexing of Basic Statutory Mortgage Limits for Multifamily Housing Programs – Effective June 4, 2020 Base City High Cost Percentage Exceptions (HCP) for the Fiscal Year 2020 (PDF) – Effective June 4, 2020

#### 2019

Effective on May 9, 2019, the annual indexing of basic statutory mortgage limits for multifamily housing programs (Section 234)(PDF) will be implemented. Base City High Cost Percentage Exceptions (HCP) for the Fiscal Year 2019 (PDF) – Effective May 9, 2019.

#### 2018

As of June 4, 2018, the annual indexing of basic statutory mortgage limits for multifamily housing programs under Section 234 (PDF) has become effective. Base City High Cost Percentage Exceptions (HCP) for the Fiscal Year 2018 (PDF) – Effective June 4, 2018.

#### 2017

As of November 7, 2017, the annual indexing of the basic statutory mortgage limits for multifamily housing programs (Section 234) has been effective. Base City High Cost Percentage Exceptions (HCP) for the 2017 Fiscal Year (PDF) – Effective November 7, 2017.

#### 2016

Effective on May 24, 2017, the annual indexing of basic statutory mortgage limits for multifamily housing programs (Section 234)(PDF) was implemented. Base City High Cost Percentage Exceptions (HCP) for the 2017 Fiscal Year (PDF) – Effective May 24, 2017.

#### 2015

On November 18, 2015, the annual indexing of basic statutory mortgage limits for multifamily housing programs was implemented (Section 234) (PDF). Base City High Cost Percentage Exceptions (HCP) for the 2015 Fiscal Year (PDF) – Effective November 18, 2015.

#### 2014

Section 234 of the Housing Act provides for the indexing of basic statutory mortgage limits for multifamily housing programs on an annual basis (PDF) Annual Base City High Cost Percentage Exceptions (HCP) are defined as follows: (PDF)

HOMEfires – Vol. 12 No. 1, July 2017 (Revised): Guidance on Using the Base City High Cost Percentages to Determine the Maximum Per-Unit Subsidy Limits for the HOME Program CPD Notice 15-003: Interim Policy on Maximum Per-Unit Subsidy Limits for the HOME Program HOMEfires – Vol. 12 No. 1, July 2017 (Revised): Guidance on Using the Base City High Cost Percentages to

### Historical

The maximum per-unit subsidy limitations for HOME are based on the restrictions set out in Section 221(d)(3) for elevator-type developments. The Office of Multi-Family Housing Programs of the Department of Housing and Urban Development sets these boundaries. Limits are set for specific “base cities” in the form of restrictions. However, there is no complete list of these restrictions that applies to all jurisdictions at this time. The HOME rules grant the CPD Division in the HUD Field Office the authority to enhance a PJ’s HOME per-unit subsidy limit when the PJ’s high cost percentage (HCP) exceeds 210 percent of the baseline Section 221(d)(3) mortgage maximum as determined by HUD’s Office of Multi-Family Housing.

Whenever a PJ’s HCP has been increased by more than 240 percent, the CPD Division shall cap the HOME per-unit subsidy ceiling at 240 percent of the basic mortgage limit set out in Section 221(d)(3) of the Housing and Community Development Act.

Specifically, the minimum HOME investment in rental housing or homeownership is \$1,000 multiplied by the number of HOME-assisted units, as defined in the HOME rules at 24 CFR 92.205. The maximum HOME investment is \$1,000,000. (c).

All HOME projects are subject to the 2012 Section 221(d)(3) limitations (PDF) (Revised): HOMEfires, Vol. 9, No. 4, August 2008 (Revised): Instructions on how to calculate the maximum HOME per-unit subsidy limits: The maximum Section 221(D)(3) mortgage amount may be increased by statutory exceptions. Tags:HOME

## 4.7 Taxes and Subsidies – Principles of Microeconomics

Topic 4: Supply and Demand in Practical Situations, Part 2

### Learning Objectives

You will be able to do the following by the conclusion of this section:

• Distinguish between the incidence of legal and economic taxes. Be familiar with how to depict taxes using the shifting curve and the wedge approach
• Understand how a tax affects the quantity and price of a product
• Give an explanation of how taxes and subsidies result in deadweight loss.

Despite the fact that taxes are not the most popular policy, they are frequently required. By changing the curve and utilizing the wedge approach, we will be able to better understand how taxes influence the market and how to mitigate their effects. First and foremost, we must distinguish between the incidence of legal taxation and the incidence of economic taxation.

## Legal versus Economic Tax Incidence

When the government establishes a tax, it must choose whether the tax will be levied against producers or against consumers. This is referred to as “legal tax incidence.” Consumer-facing taxes such as the Government Sales Tax (GST) and Provincial Sales Tax (PST) are among the most well-known types of taxes (PST). In addition, the government imposes levies on manufacturers, such as the gas tax, which reduces their profit margins. When identifying who is effected by a tax, the legal incidence of the tax is essentially immaterial to the decision.

In the same way, a tax on consumers would eventually diminish the quantity required and the excess produced by producers.

## Tax – Shifting the Curve

As discussed in Topic 3, we discovered that the supply curve was formed from a firm’s Marginal Cost and that variations in the supply curve were produced by any changes in the market that resulted in an increase in MC across the board. This is no different in the case of a tax. From the point of view of the producer, every tax imposed on them is just an increase in the marginal costs per unit produced. Examine the oil market once more to see how a tax would have an impact on the market. Suppose the government imposes a \$3 gas tax on producers (a legitimate tax incidence on producers), the supply curve will move up by \$3 as a result of the tax.

It should be noted that producers no longer earn \$5; instead, they now receive only \$2, as \$3 must be given to the government.

Imagine that the legal incidence of the tax is placed on the customers, as seen in Figure 4.7a.

For example, if customers are only ready to pay \$4/gallon for 4 million gallons of oil but are aware that they would be charged a \$3/gallon tax at the pump, they will only purchase 4 million gallons of oil if the ticket price is just \$1.

The \$2 that was paid to the producers before taxes will be returned to them. The end consequence is the same regardless of whether the tax is charged on the consumer or on the producer, demonstrating that the legal incidence of the tax is unimportant.

## Tax – The Wedge Method

Another way to look at taxes is via the lens of the wedge approach. As a result of this strategy, it is recognized that who pays the tax is ultimately immaterial. As opposed to this, the wedge approach explains how a tax creates a wedge between the price consumers pay and the revenue producers get that is proportional to the amount of tax charged. As seen in the illustration below, finding the new equilibrium is as simple as finding a \$3 wedge between the two curves. Only \$0.7 is tried for the first wedge, followed by \$1.5, and so on until the \$3.0 tax is discovered.

## Market Surplus

In the same way that price and quantity restrictions must be compared before and after a price change in order to properly appreciate the impact of a tax policy on surplus, one must compare the market surplus before and after a tax policy change. Figure 4.7d (right)

## Before

The market surplus prior to the tax has not been indicated, although this should be a normal part of the process. Make certain you understand how to obtain the values shown below: Consumer surplus is equal to \$4 million. 8 million dollars in producer surplus Market Surplus is equal to \$12 million.

## After

Based on this illustration, the market surplus following implementation of policy may be computed. Consumer Surplus (in the blue area) equals \$1 million dollars. Producer Surplus (in the red area) equals \$2 million. Revenue from the government (in the green area) = \$6 million Market Surplus is equal to \$9 million.

## Why is Government Included in Market Surplus

We did not include any mention of government revenue in our earlier examples dealing with market excess since the government was not participating in our market at the time of writing. Keep in mind that market excess is our yardstick for measuring efficiency. Without consideration for the government, this statistic would be of limited use. For the sake of this example, a million-dollar loss to the government would be considered efficient if it resulted in a one-dollar benefit to the general public.

1. As was the case with the quota, a reduction in quantity resulted in a drop in both consumer and producer surplus.
2. It is this time when consumers and producers are the ones who are being redistributed to the government.
3. Price adjustments merely rebalance the distribution of excess among consumers, producers, and the government.
4. Figure 4.7e (right)

## Transfer – The Impact of Price

The price effect of the tax causes regions A and C to be moved from consumer and producer surplus to government income as a result of the tax’s influence on prices. Bringing Consumers to the Government – Area A Gasoline was initially priced at \$4 per gallon for consumers. They are now spending \$5 per gallon of gasoline. The \$1 rise in price represents the part of the tax that consumers are responsible for paying out of pocket. Despite the fact that the tax is charged against producers, consumers are still required to shoulder a portion of the price increase.

This is due to the fact that a drop in the price to producers implies a decrease in the quantity provided, and in order to preserve equilibrium, the quantity required must reduce by an equivalent amount.

Because of this pricing shift, the government will collect \$1 x 2 million gallons, or \$2 million, in tax income from customers in the next fiscal year. Essentially, this is a direct transfer from consumers to the government, and it has no impact on the market surplus.

### Producers to Government – Area C

In the beginning, gas producers earned a \$4-per-gallon income share. They are now paid \$2 per gallon of gasoline. This \$2 reduction represents the share of the tax that manufacturers are responsible for paying. This means that the government receives \$2 million in tax income from the manufacturers for every 2 million gallons of product produced. A shift of wealth has occurred from producers to the government. According to the government’s calculations, it obtains a total of \$6 million in tax money, which is collected from consumers and manufacturers.

The Implications of Quantity on Deadweight Loss Deadweight loss would not exist if we just evaluated a transfer of surplus as a possible solution.

When customers pay a higher price, they want fewer items, and when producers pay less, they supply fewer items, resulting in a decline in the amount of merchandise available for sale.

### Consumer Surplus Decrease – Area B

A significant number of customers will abandon oil in favor of other fuels as a result of the price hike. The reduction in quantity demand of 1.5 million gallons of oil results in a deadweight loss of \$1 million in terms of oil. Producer Surpluses are declining – In addition, producers in Area Dwill reduce the amount of oil they supply by 1.5 million gallons per year because they would now only earn \$2.00 per gallon for their output. Not by chance, the magnitude of the drop is the same on both occasions.

1. It is important to remember that the amount requested must equal the quantity provided in order for the market to stay stable.
2. Take note, however, that the consequence of this quantity reduction results in a greater fall in producer surplus than consumer surplus, resulting in a \$2 million decline in producer surplus.
3. Together, these reductions result in a \$3 million reduction in deadweight (the difference between the market surplus before and market surplus after).
4. It is a benefit provided by the government to organisations or people, and it is typically in the form of a cash payment or a tax deduction.
5. In economic terms, a subsidy acts as a wedge, lowering the price consumers pay while raising the price producers get, resulting in a net loss for the government.
6. Many regulations have been created in reaction to this, allowing low-income families to remain homeowners despite their financial circumstances.
7. Please note that the following policy is impractical, but it provides for a straightforward understanding of the effect of subsidies.
8. The government wants to significantly expand the number of customers who can afford to buy a home, so it offers a \$300,000 subsidy to everyone who purchases a new home during the current fiscal year.
9. Across all of the government initiatives we’ve looked at so far, we’ve tried to figure out whether the policy has had an effect on either increasing or decreasing the market surplus.

Unfortunately, as the amount of surplus overlap on our diagram rises, the situation becomes more difficult. To make the study easier to understand, the following figure divides the changes in producers, consumers, and the government into three independent plots. Figure 4.7g (High Resolution)

### Producers

Producers will now get \$550,000 instead of \$400,000, resulting in an increase in the quantity of food delivered to 60,000 households. Areas A and B see an increase in producer surplus as a result of this.

### Consumers

Consumers now pay \$250,000 instead of \$400,000, resulting in an increase in the number of dwellings required to 60,000. This enhances consumer surplus in the areas covered by Cand D’s research.

### Government

This idea would cost the government \$18 billion and require the government to pay \$300,000 per property in order to subsidize the 60,000 customers who are purchasing new homes. In terms of numbers, this corresponds to a reduction in government spending in areas A, B, C, D, and E.

### Result

These are the regions where we anticipate total benefits from the policy (to producers and consumers), whereas the areas where we anticipate entire losses (the cost to the government) are areas A, B, C, D and E. To sum it all up: Specifically, the government transfers control of Areas A, B, C, and D to consumers and producers. Area E represents a deadweight loss resulting from the policy. There are two points to take note of in this particular scenario. First and foremost, the program was effective in increasing the number of residences built from 40,000 to 60,000.

It’s important to remember that if a quantity is moved from its equilibrium value, in the absence of externalities, there is a deadweight loss.

## Summary

A taxation or subsidization scheme is more complex than a pricing or quantity control scheme due to the involvement of a third economic player: the government. As we have shown, who is subjected to a tax or subsidy is immaterial when analyzing how the market ultimately performs. Take note that the past three sections have given a bleak picture of the effectiveness of policy tools. This is due to the fact that our model does not yet account for the external costs that economic players impose on the macro-environment (pollution, sickness, and so on), nor does it assign any significance to equality.

For the reasons stated above, we may conclude that the legal incidence of the tax does not important; but, what does?

## Glossary

Economic Tax Incidence is the distribution of tax depending on who bears the burden in the new equilibrium, which is determined by the elasticity of the new equilibrium market. Legal Tax Incidence refers to the legal allocation of who is responsible for paying the tax.

Subsidy is a benefit provided by the government to organisations or people, and it is typically in the form of a monetary transfer or a decrease in taxation. It is frequently done in order to relieve some form of burden, and it is frequently deemed to be in the general public’s best interests.

### Exercises 4.7

For the following THREE questions, refer to the supply and demand curves depicted in the illustration below. Take, for example, the imposition of a \$20 per unit tax in this industry. 1.Can you tell me which regions reflect the loss in consumer and producer surplus as a result of this taxation? If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] or [phone number]. If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] or [phone number] or [email protected] or [email protected].

• 3.In which areas does the deadweight loss connected with this tax manifest itself?
• Given the after-tax equilibrium in the sock market, which of the following claims is FALSE if the government imposes a constant per-unit tax on socks: (Assume that the demand curve for socks is downward sloping.) a) As a result of the tax, consumers are in a worse financial position.
• Because of the tax, producers are in a worse financial position.
• 5.Refer to the supply and demand diagram in the next section.
• If a subsidy is brought into a market, which of the following statements is TRUE?
• Make no assumptions about externalities.

b) The surpluses of consumers and producers fall, but the surplus of society grows.

d) The consumer surplus, the producer surplus, and the social surplus are all on the decline.

Suppose that a \$6 per unit tax is imposed in this market, the price that consumers pay will be equal to , and the price that producers get net of the tax will be equal to .

This market’s new equilibrium quantity will be:a) 20 units if a \$6 per unit tax is imposed on each unit sold.

c) A total of 60 units.

9) Which of the following claims regarding the deadweight loss of taxes is TRUE?

b) If there is no deadweight loss, then the income raised by the government equals exactly the amount of money lost by consumers and producers as a result of the taxation.

d) Neither a) nor b) are correct.

a) The surpluses of consumers and producers rise, while the surplus of society falls.

b) The surpluses of consumers, producers, and society as a whole all grow in size.

11.Which of the following best illustrates the equilibrium consequences of a per unit subsidy?

Price increases for consumers, but producer prices decline and supply increases.

b) The consumer price increases, the producer price increases, and the amount of goods produced increases.

12.Refer to the supply and demand diagram in the next paragraph.

a) Five dollars; ten dollars A) \$6; \$11.

C) \$8; \$3.

13.

What will be the equilibrium quantity if a \$2 per unit subsidy is put in the market?

b) A total of 45 units.

d) A total of 55 units.

Assume that: I there are no externalities; and (ii) in the absence of government regulation, the market supply curve is the one labeled S1.14 (supply curve in the absence of government regulation).

Which section of the market will suffer the most from the imposition of a \$5 per unit tax in this market? a) The letter a. b) a + b.c) a + b.d) a + d.e) a + d. d) the sum of a, b, and c.

## Per Unit Subsidy – Wolfram Demonstrations Project

Getting the live version up and running This Demonstration presents the per unit subsidy model; you may change the demand and supply elasticity slopes, as well as the quantity of the subsidy, in this demonstration. You have the option of displaying consumer, producer, total subsidy, and deadweight loss data. As a result of this demonstration, total subsidy, deadweight loss, the percent of subsidy that gets to customers, the amount that goes to suppliers, and the amount demanded are all computed and displayed.

## Snapshots

Define the following variables: demand intercept, demand elasticity, supply intercept, supply elasticity, per capita subsidy, and per capita subsidy. When you multiply subsidised quantities together, you get supply less demand. The total amount of subsidies equals the total amount of deadweight loss. The percent of the total subsidy that goes to consumers is calculated by dividing the difference between the equilibrium price and what customers pay times the entire subsidy. The blue triangle represents consumer surplus, the red triangle represents producer surplus, the green rectangle represents the entire amount of subsidies, and the black triangle represents deadweight loss.

On the left, the price that buyers must pay is shown in blue.

## 4.7 Taxes and Subsidies – Principles of Microeconomics

You will be able to do the following by the conclusion of this section:

• Distinguish between the incidence of legal and economic taxes. Be familiar with how to depict taxes using the shifting curve and the wedge approach
• Understand how a tax affects the quantity and price of a product
• Give an explanation of how taxes and subsidies result in deadweight loss.

Despite the fact that taxes are not the most popular policy, they are frequently required. By changing the curve and utilizing the wedge approach, we will be able to better understand how taxes influence the market and how to mitigate their effects. First and foremost, we must distinguish between the incidence of legal taxation and the incidence of economic taxation.

## Legal versus Economic Tax Incidence

When the government establishes a tax, it must choose whether the tax will be levied against producers or against consumers. This is referred to as “legal tax incidence.” Consumer-facing taxes such as the Government Sales Tax (GST) and Provincial Sales Tax (PST) are among the most well-known types of taxes (PST). In addition, the government imposes levies on manufacturers, such as the gas tax, which reduces their profit margins. When identifying who is effected by a tax, the legal incidence of the tax is essentially immaterial to the decision.

In the same way, a tax on consumers would eventually diminish the quantity required and the excess produced by producers.

## Tax – Shifting the Curve

As discussed in Topic 3, we discovered that the supply curve was formed from a firm’s Marginal Cost and that variations in the supply curve were produced by any changes in the market that resulted in an increase in MC across the board. This is no different in the case of a tax. From the point of view of the producer, every tax imposed on them is just an increase in the marginal costs per unit produced. Examine the oil market once more to see how a tax would have an impact on the market. Suppose the government imposes a \$3 gas tax on producers (a legitimate tax incidence on producers), the supply curve will move up by \$3 as a result of the tax.

It should be noted that producers no longer earn \$5; instead, they now receive only \$2, as \$3 must be given to the government.

Imagine that the legal incidence of the tax is placed on the customers, as seen in Figure 4.7a.

For example, if customers are only ready to pay \$4/gallon for 4 million gallons of oil but are aware that they would be charged a \$3/gallon tax at the pump, they will only purchase 4 million gallons of oil if the ticket price is just \$1.

The \$2 that was paid to the producers before taxes will be returned to them. The end consequence is the same regardless of whether the tax is charged on the consumer or on the producer, demonstrating that the legal incidence of the tax is unimportant.

## Tax – The Wedge Method

Another way to look at taxes is via the lens of the wedge approach. As a result of this strategy, it is recognized that who pays the tax is ultimately immaterial. As opposed to this, the wedge approach explains how a tax creates a wedge between the price consumers pay and the revenue producers get that is proportional to the amount of tax charged. As seen in the illustration below, finding the new equilibrium is as simple as finding a \$3 wedge between the two curves. Only \$0.7 is tried for the first wedge, followed by \$1.5, and so on until the \$3.0 tax is discovered.

## Market Surplus

In the same way that price and quantity restrictions must be compared before and after a price change in order to properly appreciate the impact of a tax policy on surplus, one must compare the market surplus before and after a tax policy change. Figure 4.7d (right)

## Before

The market surplus prior to the tax has not been indicated, although this should be a normal part of the process. Make certain you understand how to obtain the values shown below: Consumer surplus is equal to \$4 million. 8 million dollars in producer surplus Market Surplus is equal to \$12 million.

## After

Based on this illustration, the market surplus following implementation of policy may be computed. Consumer Surplus (in the blue area) equals \$1 million dollars. Producer Surplus (in the red area) equals \$2 million. Revenue from the government (in the green area) = \$6 million Market Surplus is equal to \$9 million.

## Why is Government Included in Market Surplus

We did not include any mention of government revenue in our earlier examples dealing with market excess since the government was not participating in our market at the time of writing. Keep in mind that market excess is our yardstick for measuring efficiency. Without consideration for the government, this statistic would be of limited use. For the sake of this example, a million-dollar loss to the government would be considered efficient if it resulted in a one-dollar benefit to the general public.

1. As was the case with the quota, a reduction in quantity resulted in a drop in both consumer and producer surplus.
2. It is this time when consumers and producers are the ones who are being redistributed to the government.
3. Price adjustments merely rebalance the distribution of excess among consumers, producers, and the government.
4. Figure 4.7e (right)

## Transfer – The Impact of Price

The price effect of the tax causes regions A and C to be moved from consumer and producer surplus to government income as a result of the tax’s influence on prices. Bringing Consumers to the Government – Area A Gasoline was initially priced at \$4 per gallon for consumers. They are now spending \$5 per gallon of gasoline. The \$1 rise in price represents the part of the tax that consumers are responsible for paying out of pocket. Despite the fact that the tax is charged against producers, consumers are still required to shoulder a portion of the price increase.

This is due to the fact that a drop in the price to producers implies a decrease in the quantity provided, and in order to preserve equilibrium, the quantity required must reduce by an equivalent amount.

Because of this pricing shift, the government will collect \$1 x 2 million gallons, or \$2 million, in tax income from customers in the next fiscal year. Essentially, this is a direct transfer from consumers to the government, and it has no impact on the market surplus.

### Producers to Government – Area C

In the beginning, gas producers earned a \$4-per-gallon income share. They are now paid \$2 per gallon of gasoline. This \$2 reduction represents the share of the tax that manufacturers are responsible for paying. This means that the government receives \$2 million in tax income from the manufacturers for every 2 million gallons of product produced. A shift of wealth has occurred from producers to the government. According to the government’s calculations, it obtains a total of \$6 million in tax money, which is collected from consumers and manufacturers.

The Implications of Quantity on Deadweight Loss Deadweight loss would not exist if we just evaluated a transfer of surplus as a possible solution.

When customers pay a higher price, they want fewer items, and when producers pay less, they supply fewer items, resulting in a decline in the amount of merchandise available for sale.

### Consumer Surplus Decrease – Area B

A significant number of customers will abandon oil in favor of other fuels as a result of the price hike. The reduction in quantity demand of 1.5 million gallons of oil results in a deadweight loss of \$1 million in terms of oil. Producer Surpluses are declining – In addition, producers in Area Dwill reduce the amount of oil they supply by 1.5 million gallons per year because they would now only earn \$2.00 per gallon for their output. Not by chance, the magnitude of the drop is the same on both occasions.

1. It is important to remember that the amount requested must equal the quantity provided in order for the market to stay stable.
2. Take note, however, that the consequence of this quantity reduction results in a greater fall in producer surplus than consumer surplus, resulting in a \$2 million decline in producer surplus.
3. Together, these reductions result in a \$3 million reduction in deadweight (the difference between the market surplus before and market surplus after).
4. It is a benefit provided by the government to organisations or people, and it is typically in the form of a cash payment or a tax deduction.
5. In economic terms, a subsidy acts as a wedge, lowering the price consumers pay while raising the price producers get, resulting in a net loss for the government.
6. Many regulations have been created in reaction to this, allowing low-income families to remain homeowners despite their financial circumstances.
7. Please note that the following policy is impractical, but it provides for a straightforward understanding of the effect of subsidies.
8. The government wants to significantly expand the number of customers who can afford to buy a home, so it offers a \$300,000 subsidy to everyone who purchases a new home during the current fiscal year.
9. Across all of the government initiatives we’ve looked at so far, we’ve tried to figure out whether the policy has had an effect on either increasing or decreasing the market surplus.

Unfortunately, as the amount of surplus overlap on our diagram rises, the situation becomes more difficult. To make the study easier to understand, the following figure divides the changes in producers, consumers, and the government into three independent plots. Figure 4.7g (High Resolution)

### Producers

Producers will now get \$550,000 instead of \$400,000, resulting in an increase in the quantity of food delivered to 60,000 households. Areas A and B see an increase in producer surplus as a result of this.

### Consumers

Consumers now pay \$250,000 instead of \$400,000, resulting in an increase in the number of dwellings required to 60,000. This enhances consumer surplus in the areas covered by Cand D’s research.

### Government

This idea would cost the government \$18 billion and require the government to pay \$300,000 per property in order to subsidize the 60,000 customers who are purchasing new homes. In terms of numbers, this corresponds to a reduction in government spending in areas A, B, C, D, and E.

### Result

These are the regions where we anticipate total benefits from the policy (to producers and consumers), whereas the areas where we anticipate entire losses (the cost to the government) are areas A, B, C, D and E. To sum it all up: Specifically, the government transfers control of Areas A, B, C, and D to consumers and producers. Area E represents a deadweight loss resulting from the policy. There are two points to take note of in this particular scenario. First and foremost, the program was effective in increasing the number of residences built from 40,000 to 60,000.

It’s important to remember that if a quantity is moved from its equilibrium value, in the absence of externalities, there is a deadweight loss.

## Summary

A taxation or subsidization scheme is more complex than a pricing or quantity control scheme due to the involvement of a third economic player: the government. As we have shown, who is subjected to a tax or subsidy is immaterial when analyzing how the market ultimately performs. Take note that the past three sections have given a bleak picture of the effectiveness of policy tools. This is due to the fact that our model does not yet account for the external costs that economic players impose on the macro-environment (pollution, sickness, and so on), nor does it assign any significance to equality.

For the reasons stated above, we may conclude that the legal incidence of the tax does not important; but, what does?

## Glossary

Economic Tax Incidence is the distribution of tax depending on who bears the burden in the new equilibrium, which is determined by the elasticity of the new equilibrium market. Legal Tax Incidence refers to the legal allocation of who is responsible for paying the tax.

Subsidy is a benefit provided by the government to organisations or people, and it is typically in the form of a monetary transfer or a decrease in taxation. It is frequently done in order to relieve some form of burden, and it is frequently deemed to be in the general public’s best interests.

### Exercises 4.7

For the following THREE questions, refer to the supply and demand curves depicted in the illustration below. Take, for example, the imposition of a \$20 per unit tax in this industry. 1.Can you tell me which regions reflect the loss in consumer and producer surplus as a result of this taxation? If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] or [phone number]. If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] or [phone number] or [email protected] or [email protected].

3.In which areas does the deadweight loss connected with this tax manifest itself?

Given the after-tax equilibrium in the sock market, which of the following claims is FALSE if the government imposes a constant per-unit tax on socks: (Assume that the demand curve for socks is downward sloping.) a) As a result of the tax, consumers are in a worse financial position.

Because of the tax, producers are in a worse financial position.

5.Refer to the supply and demand diagram in the next section.

If a subsidy is brought into a market, which of the following statements is TRUE?

b) The surpluses of consumers and producers fall, but the surplus of society grows.

d) The consumer surplus, the producer surplus, and the social surplus are all on the decline.

Suppose that a \$6 per unit tax is imposed in this market, the price that consumers pay will be equal to , and the price that producers get net of the tax will be equal to .

This market’s new equilibrium quantity will be:a) 20 units if a \$6 per unit tax is imposed on each unit sold.

c) A total of 60 units.

9) Which of the following claims regarding the deadweight loss of taxes is TRUE?

b) If there is no deadweight loss, then the income raised by the government equals exactly the amount of money lost by consumers and producers as a result of the taxation.

d) Neither a) nor b) are correct.

a) The surpluses of consumers and producers rise, while the surplus of society falls.

b) The surpluses of consumers, producers, and society as a whole all grow in size.

11.Which of the following best illustrates the equilibrium consequences of a per unit subsidy?

Price increases for consumers, but producer prices decline and supply increases.

b) The consumer price increases, the producer price increases, and the amount of goods produced increases.

12.Refer to the supply and demand diagram in the next paragraph.

a) Five dollars; ten dollars A) \$6; \$11.

C) \$8; \$3.

13.

What will be the equilibrium quantity if a \$2 per unit subsidy is put in the market?

b) A total of 45 units.

d) A total of 55 units.

Assume that: I there are no externalities; and (ii) in the absence of government regulation, the market supply curve is the one labeled S1.14 (supply curve in the absence of government regulation).

Which section of the market will suffer the most from the imposition of a \$5 per unit tax in this market? a) The letter a. b) a + b.c) a + b.d) a + d.e) a + d. d) the sum of a, b, and c.